From ec9d30d92533d9835c4392e8c10f5913394933dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maltesius Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 11:36:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] missing math field --- report/src/sections/06-results.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/report/src/sections/06-results.tex b/report/src/sections/06-results.tex index 9f01634..ba3d3c0 100644 --- a/report/src/sections/06-results.tex +++ b/report/src/sections/06-results.tex @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ \subsection{Shuffle security}\label{subsec:Shuffle-security} In general all three of the experiments, despite the difference in $\alpha$, show the same trend. They all level out but the higher the $\alpha$ is, the lower the leveling happens but the later it happens as well. There are two things however that are different between the experiments. -At an $\alpha$ of 4096 we can see that at the start, with $\ell=32$, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure is \sim500 lower than the 2 others. +At an $\alpha$ of 4096 we can see that at the start, with $\ell=32$, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure is $\sim500$ lower than the 2 others. As $\ell$ increases, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure becomes similar to the other $\alpha$ values. Another thing that differs between the experiments is that they all have sudden dip later on in the experiment. Here we can see a trend that the lower the~$\alpha$ is, the earlier the dip happens. \ No newline at end of file