Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Simplified path: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I think this topic has been discussed already in some way, but I also think it would be nice to create a discussion here to talk about it in a comprehensive way.
My question is: let's suppose I'm doing a boolean difference between two closed profiles; let's take the following picture as an example: here a boolean difference between the green rectangle (subject) and red rectangle (clipper) is perfomed (of course green and red rectangles are partially overlapped). I would expect ot obtain the first result drawn in the upper right (drawn in green), but I often obtain the second result (the lower right one), where a very thin stripe is present.
I usually scale the input coords (that are doubles) something like 1.0e6 and turn those into int before passing it to Clipper routines. Of course I understand that those thin portions could be casued by small fluctuations in the input data (because of numerical factors or something), but I would like to know the best strategy to reduce those thin portions.
Hope I've been clear, hope to start a discussion here
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions