@@ -318,6 +318,45 @@ \subsection{Homogeneity Score}
318
318
\section {V Measure }
319
319
\subsection {V Measure }
320
320
321
+ V-Measure is an external clustering evaluation metric that combines the strengths of two complementary criteria: Homogeneity
322
+ (how pure clusters are with respect to ground-truth classes) and Completeness (how well all members of a class are grouped into
323
+ the same cluster). It is computed as the harmonic mean of these two scores, similar to how precision and recall are combined into
324
+ the F-score.
325
+
326
+ \begin {center }
327
+ FORMULA GOES HERE
328
+ \end {center }
329
+
330
+ By design, V-Measure is bounded between 0.0 and 1.0, with higher scores indicating better clustering quality. A score of 1.0
331
+ means that both homogeneity and completeness are perfectly satisfied.
332
+
333
+ \textbf {When to use the V-measure? }
334
+
335
+ V-Measure is ideal for evaluating clustering solutions when you need a balanced assessment of both purity within clusters and the
336
+ completeness of class representation.
337
+
338
+ \coloredboxes {
339
+ \item Combines homogeneity and completeness into a single score, providing a holistic evaluation of clustering quality.
340
+ \item The $ \beta $ parameter allows customization to prioritize either homogeneity or completeness based on specific use cases.
341
+ \item Clustering algorithm agnostic.
342
+ }
343
+ {
344
+ \item Requires ground-truth labels.
345
+ \item V-Measure inherits the trade-off between homogeneity and completeness. Adjusting one often impacts the other, making it
346
+ challenging to optimize both in some scenarios.
347
+ \item Not normalized with regards to random labeling.
348
+ }
349
+
350
+ \clearpage
351
+
352
+ \thispagestyle {customstyle}
353
+
354
+ \textbf {Other related metrics }
355
+
356
+ V-Measure excels as a comprehensive metric for clustering evaluation. However, for specific insights, it can be supplemented with
357
+ individual Homogeneity and Completeness scores. Additionally, pair-based measures like Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) or
358
+ information-theoretic measures like Variation of Information (VI) may provide complementary perspectives in specific use cases.
359
+
321
360
% ---------- Davis Bouldin Score ----------
322
361
\clearpage
323
362
\thispagestyle {clusteringstyle}
0 commit comments