Skip to content

should a check valve be a valve or a pipe? #106

@jamesuber

Description

@jamesuber

Right now it seems to be considered to be a valve, different from a pipe. Result is that when you change a pipe to a check valve, then it gets confusing about whether that's really a different type of object, and existing data connections can be severed. For example a valve can accept a setting, but that doesn't apply logically to a check valve, so its more like a pipe in that case. however it's useful to keep track of check valves, different from pipes. So no change should be made to harm our ability to do that.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions