Skip to content

Commit c976943

Browse files
committed
update readme labels
1 parent 67f7be1 commit c976943

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-3
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 4 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ TorchSim achieves up to 100x speedup compared to ASE with popular MLIPs.
9797
This figure compares the time per atom of ASE and `torch_sim`. Time per atom is defined
9898
as the number of atoms / total time. While ASE can only run a single system of `n_atoms`
9999
(on the $x$ axis), `torch_sim` can run as many systems as will fit in memory. On an H100 80 GB card,
100-
the max atoms that could fit in memory was ~8,000 for [GemNet](https://github.com/FAIR-Chem/fairchem), ~10,000 for [MACE](https://github.com/ACEsuit/mace), and ~2,500
101-
for [SevenNet](https://github.com/MDIL-SNU/SevenNet). This metric describes model performance by capturing speed and memory
102-
usage simultaneously.
100+
the max atoms that could fit in memory was ~8,000 for [EGIP](https://github.com/FAIR-Chem/fairchem),
101+
~10,000 for [MACE-MPA-0](https://github.com/ACEsuit/mace), ~22,000 for [Mattersim V1 1M](https://github.com/microsoft/mattersim),
102+
~2,500 for [SevenNet](https://github.com/MDIL-SNU/SevenNet), and ~9000 for [PET-MAD](https://github.com/lab-cosmo/pet-mad).
103+
This metric describes model performance by capturing speed and memory usage simultaneously.
103104

104105
## Installation
105106

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)