@@ -29,3 +29,41 @@ It should be scheduled after run-time speed optimization.
29
29
I predicted I would be tired at the end of the course and I predicted
30
30
these would be my worst lectures, as I felt the same in earlier
31
31
iterations of the course.
32
+
33
+ ## Whole course
34
+
35
+ I feel I did a reasonable job.
36
+ We all (teachers and learners) helped create a warm atmosphere in the course.
37
+
38
+ My favorite improvement was my exercises: thanks to the Retrospect at day 1,
39
+ I suddenly understood what was needed. 'No plan surives first contact with
40
+ the enemy', they say, for me it was more that the retrospect made me
41
+ prioritize better.
42
+
43
+ I would now say that a good exercise is:
44
+
45
+ - Clearly described what to do
46
+ - Has a worked-out solution
47
+ - If possible: has multiple skill levels
48
+
49
+ I want to have this in all my exercises, before next course iteration.
50
+
51
+ - [ ] Make all exercises like that
52
+
53
+ I enjoyed the team of teachers. My favorite is how we can flat-out
54
+ disagree, without any drama.
55
+
56
+ The course is a complex beast, with many dependencies between lessons.
57
+ I wonder why we do not have written a script to check if our schedule holds?
58
+
59
+ - [ ] Make stub of script, to be used in CI
60
+
61
+ I've added domain-specific knowledge, in the form of biology.
62
+ I think it should be general things we have exercises of
63
+
64
+ - [ ] Remove biology things
65
+
66
+ I think the project should be worked on more and be simplified.
67
+ Maybe start with a proper/pre-fab requirements list.
68
+ Branch of from the main function more.
69
+
0 commit comments