Skip to content

Commit 76ba2be

Browse files
authored
fixed links in KLS/Ch7.1 docs (#266)
1 parent f306070 commit 76ba2be

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

src/Samples/Kaleidoscope/Chapter7.1/Kaleidoscope-ch7.1.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ uid: Kaleidoscope-ch7.1
77
> runtime like Kaleidoscope thus far. It does NOT allow for re-defining a
88
> function. Once it is defined, you cannot define it again or an exception
99
> or application crash will occur. Hopefully a future variant of this sample
10-
> will address tracking and removing that. See [Special notes for interactive run-times](#special-notes-for-interactive-runtimes)
10+
> will address tracking and removing that. See [Special notes for interactive run-times](#special-notes-for-interactive-run-times)
1111
> for more details.
1212
1313
# 7. Kaleidoscope: Extreme Lazy JIT
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ language or runtime wants to use. For most DSLs like Kaleidoscope these trade-of
138138
generally relevant (Or even necessary) as the fundamental point is to simplify expression of a
139139
particular domain problem in domain terminology. Performance trade-offs are often not that
140140
important for such cases. (And can occasionally get in the way - See [Special notes for
141-
interactive run-times](#special-notes-for-interactive-runtimes) below for more details)
141+
interactive run-times](#special-notes-for-interactive-run-times) below for more details)
142142

143143
### Special notes for interactive run-times
144144
It turns out that re-definition of a lazy JIT'd function is a rather complex problem involving

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)