Naming of dataclasses: integration tests warn of pytestcollection warning

[niksheridan]

Is it useful to name the dataclasses with a TestXXXXX prefix, as when making assertions with pytest and importing this dataclass this appears to create confusion in collection? (for example)
I always try to reuse unless forced not to. Reduction of cosmetic or informational errors in test output helps increase focus on the real source of unexpected behaviour.
I suppose this is similar to prefixing a function with test_XXX not using it for integration or unit testing.
Please do not take this as a criticism, I very much like the code in this repo 🤩

Has anyone worked around this?