Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
iavl v1 should be more efficient than iavl v0, but when you upgrade iavl v0 to v1, there's a phase that v0/v1 co-exists, not sure if the mix phase makes things worse. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
The observation and tracking of storage usage on blockchain after upgrading to SDK
v0.50.x
and iavlv1.2.4
show a tremendous speed growth.Storage usage, especially
application.db
(for seed/validator node) andblockstore.db
(for full node), comparison shows:according to benchmarks here it seems IAVLv1 is storage consuming.
Is there any suggestion or a similar experience?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions