Replies: 2 comments
-
You may consider increase the prefactor of the energy loss, i.e. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
By the way, you need to ensure the DFT accuracy is enough before doing
everything else.
…On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:41 PM Jinzhe Zeng ***@***.***> wrote:
You may consider increase the prefactor of the energy loss, i.e.
loss/start_pref_e and loss/limit_pref_e. The current value is quite small.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3251 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACIOQ7WUH6M47D366JNYQ33YSZ3VLAVCNFSM6AAAAABDA3UHROVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DIMRSGY3TA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have done some trainings on a small molecule and the obtained results is shown in the attached figure.
The input.json is also attatched.
As can be seen, the energy is much worse than force. I have tried to increase the start_pref_e and limit_pref_e as suggested in some discussions. However, both energy and force become worse than using the parameters given in the examples.
I wonder whether there is any other suggestions to improve the results.
Thanks!
input.json
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions