Building from sources and not using qt creator #189
Replies: 1 comment
-
Dear @eanisutkin Sorry for late reply. The reason why I used the library method was because of the version control for dll(so) after distribution. So I also proceeded with the method(pri) that does not use lib(a) and dll(so) at all. I will also consider what you said. Thank you for your good opinion. 😃 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I am currently evaluating the library on the point of using it in an environment with no Qt creator at all.
However I've run into several problems:
Usage demo implies QtCreator, which i don't have at all, I do however have qt build as shared libraries strait from sources. Currently it looks like i won't be able to use this library
This is a statically linked code, however i can't fandom why. Static lib is not always good, for example I needed a shared variant and had to figure out how to rebuilt it. A guide for building a shared library with changeble target path would be welcome
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions