Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2022. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2022. It is now read-only.

Unit tests #68

@postfalk

Description

@postfalk

Hi @nathanielrindlaub.

I would like to discuss the topic of unit testing again. I think it would be particular important if contractors start working on the same code base. In the beginning it seems like a huge investment to go that round but it really does pay of, especially if you rewrite or replace certain parts of the code.

I am not very strict with test-driven development. Strict would be, 1. create a spec, 2. write a test for the spec, 3. write the unit. I usually do 1. write a unit, 2. write a test that confirms the unit working (sometimes not before I actually get to reworking the unit). 3. improve and rework the unit (as needed).

Sorry, if I am way behind and you are doing this already but let's just discuss it anyways.

Falk

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions