Skip to content

missing math field #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion report/src/sections/06-results.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ \subsection{Shuffle security}\label{subsec:Shuffle-security}
In general all three of the experiments, despite the difference in $\alpha$, show the same trend.
They all level out but the higher the $\alpha$ is, the lower the leveling happens but the later it happens as well.
There are two things however that are different between the experiments.
At an $\alpha$ of 4096 we can see that at the start, with $\ell=32$, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure is \sim500 lower than the 2 others.
At an $\alpha$ of 4096 we can see that at the start, with $\ell=32$, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure is $\sim500$ lower than the 2 others.
As $\ell$ increases, the mean number of honest shuffles necessary to make the shuffle secure becomes similar to the other $\alpha$ values.
Another thing that differs between the experiments is that they all have sudden dip later on in the experiment.
Here we can see a trend that the lower the~$\alpha$ is, the earlier the dip happens.
Loading