Skip to content

fix header #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2025
Merged

fix header #91

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2025

Conversation

alanzhang25
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @alanzhang25, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses an issue with the headers being sent in the judgeval application. Specifically, it adds the X-Organization-Id header to the save_trace function and removes the judgment_api_key from the JSON payload of the delete_trace function. This ensures that the organization ID is included when saving traces and that the API key is not unnecessarily sent when deleting traces.

Highlights

  • Header Addition: The X-Organization-Id header is added to the save_trace function to include the organization ID in the request.
  • Payload Modification: The judgment_api_key is removed from the JSON payload of the delete_trace function.

Changelog

  • src/judgeval/common/tracer.py
    • Added X-Organization-Id header to the save_trace function (line 231).
    • Removed judgment_api_key from the JSON payload of the delete_trace function (line 249).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A header's missed, a key's misplaced,
The API call, a bit disgraced.
With careful fix, and code so neat,
The traces flow, complete, discrete.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a new header X-Organization-Id to the save_trace and fetch_trace methods, and removes judgment_api_key from the delete_trace method. These changes seem reasonable for improving security and organization within the tracing system. However, I have a few questions regarding the removal of judgment_api_key from the delete_trace method.

Summary of Findings

  • Redundant API Key: The judgment_api_key is being removed from the request body of the delete_trace method, but it is still present in the headers. Is this intentional? If so, please provide a comment explaining why it is no longer needed in the request body.

Merge Readiness

The code changes seem reasonable, but I have a question regarding the removal of judgment_api_key from the delete_trace method. I would recommend addressing this before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Comment on lines 249 to 250
json={
"judgment_api_key": self.judgment_api_key,
"trace_ids": [trace_id],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The judgment_api_key is being removed from the request body, but it is still present in the headers. Is this intentional? If so, please provide a comment explaining why it is no longer needed in the request body.

@alanzhang25 alanzhang25 merged commit 864ff04 into main Mar 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@alanzhang25 alanzhang25 deleted the az-add-header branch March 25, 2025 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant