Add ContigousBitset64 container type.
#323
Merged
+148
−8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lokathor
added
semver-minor
|
Update: I was advised that this can be a totally separate crate that just lives in the bytemuck repo, but is published under some other name, like |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The idea here is that you have some sort of
Contiguousvalues and you want to store a "Set" of them without allocating, mostly with the ability to ergonomically check what's in the set. we don't need every single Set function under the sun in this API, because all of our values that could be in the set are naturally immutable anyway.Of course, this only works with
Contiguoustypes where there's no more than 64 potential values, but still.