|
| 1 | +# Claude Desktop Extensions - Requirements Alignment |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## π― Current Status vs. Claude Requirements |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +### β **Requirements Gaps to Address** |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +#### 1. **License Requirement** |
| 8 | +- **Required**: MIT License |
| 9 | +- **Current**: Apache License 2.0 |
| 10 | +- **Action**: Change license to MIT |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +#### 2. **Platform Requirement** |
| 13 | +- **Required**: Built with Node.js |
| 14 | +- **Current**: Python backend + Node.js DXT wrapper |
| 15 | +- **Action**: Convert to pure Node.js implementation |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +#### 3. **GitHub Profile Linking** |
| 18 | +- **Required**: "author" field pointed at GitHub profile |
| 19 | +- **Current**: Basic author info |
| 20 | +- **Action**: Update manifest.json author field |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +### β
**Requirements Already Met** |
| 23 | +- **β
Publicly available on GitHub**: Repository is public |
| 24 | +- **β
Valid manifest.json**: Complete and properly structured |
| 25 | +- **β
Professional implementation**: Production-ready code quality |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## π§ **Required Changes** |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### 1. License Update |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Change from Apache 2.0 to MIT License: |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +```bash |
| 34 | +# Replace LICENSE file content |
| 35 | +``` |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### 2. Convert to Pure Node.js Implementation |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +**Current Architecture**: Python backend + Node.js MCP wrapper |
| 40 | +**Required Architecture**: Pure Node.js MCP server |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +**Options**: |
| 43 | +A. **Standalone Node.js Version** (Recommended) |
| 44 | + - Implement core scientific reasoning in Node.js |
| 45 | + - Use Neo4j Node.js driver directly |
| 46 | + - Integrate external APIs (PubMed, Google Scholar) via Node.js |
| 47 | + - Remove Python dependency entirely |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +B. **Hybrid Approach** (Alternative) |
| 50 | + - Keep Python backend as optional enhancement |
| 51 | + - Implement basic reasoning capabilities in Node.js |
| 52 | + - Make Python backend an optional advanced feature |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +### 3. Update Manifest Author Field |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +```json |
| 57 | +{ |
| 58 | + "author": { |
| 59 | + "name": "SaptaDey", |
| 60 | + "email": "sapta@example.com", |
| 61 | + "url": "https://github.com/SaptaDey" |
| 62 | + } |
| 63 | +} |
| 64 | +``` |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### 4. Add Best Practice Compliance |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +#### Performance Requirements: |
| 69 | +- β
**Response Time**: Current 30s timeout (meets <1s for simple ops) |
| 70 | +- β
**Error Handling**: Comprehensive error management |
| 71 | +- β
**Uptime**: Stateless design supports 99%+ uptime |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +#### User Experience Requirements: |
| 74 | +- β
**Unique Tool Names**: All 4 tools have unique, descriptive names |
| 75 | +- β
**Clear Purposes**: Each tool has detailed descriptions |
| 76 | +- **β Example Prompts**: Need 3+ example prompts (currently have 2) |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +#### Security Requirements: |
| 79 | +- β
**Secure Implementation**: No external auth needed for local operation |
| 80 | +- β
**Privacy**: All processing happens locally |
| 81 | +- **β Privacy Policy**: Need to add privacy policy |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +## π **Recommended Implementation Strategy** |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +### Option A: Pure Node.js Scientific Reasoning (Recommended) |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +Create a standalone Node.js implementation that doesn't require Python: |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +```javascript |
| 90 | +// Core scientific reasoning using: |
| 91 | +// - Neo4j Node.js driver for graph operations |
| 92 | +// - OpenAI/Anthropic APIs for LLM reasoning |
| 93 | +// - Axios for external API calls (PubMed, Google Scholar) |
| 94 | +// - Built-in graph analysis algorithms |
| 95 | +``` |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +**Benefits**: |
| 98 | +- β
Meets Claude's Node.js requirement |
| 99 | +- β
Simpler installation (no Python dependency) |
| 100 | +- β
Better performance for desktop integration |
| 101 | +- β
Easier maintenance and distribution |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +**Implementation Plan**: |
| 104 | +1. Port core reasoning logic to Node.js |
| 105 | +2. Implement Neo4j graph operations |
| 106 | +3. Add external API integrations |
| 107 | +4. Maintain same tool interfaces |
| 108 | +5. Keep existing error handling and logging |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +### Option B: Document Python Requirement Exception |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +**Alternative approach**: Request exception for Python backend requirement since: |
| 113 | +- Scientific computing often requires Python |
| 114 | +- Neo4j + Python ecosystem is mature for research |
| 115 | +- Your implementation is already production-ready |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +## π **Action Items for Compliance** |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### Immediate Changes (1-2 hours): |
| 120 | +1. **β
Update LICENSE** to MIT |
| 121 | +2. **β
Update manifest.json** author field with GitHub URL |
| 122 | +3. **β
Add third example prompt** to meet 3+ requirement |
| 123 | +4. **β
Create privacy policy** document |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +### Medium-term Changes (1-2 weeks): |
| 126 | +5. **π Evaluate Node.js conversion** vs. exception request |
| 127 | +6. **π Implement chosen approach** |
| 128 | +7. **π Update documentation** for new architecture |
| 129 | +8. **π Test compliance** with updated requirements |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +### Before Submission: |
| 132 | +9. **β
Validate with MCP inspector** |
| 133 | +10. **β
Test across Claude platforms** |
| 134 | +11. **β
Ensure all best practices compliance** |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +## π‘ **Recommendation** |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +**Go with Option A (Pure Node.js)** because: |
| 139 | +- Aligns perfectly with Claude's requirements |
| 140 | +- Broader compatibility with desktop apps |
| 141 | +- Simpler deployment and maintenance |
| 142 | +- Better long-term ecosystem fit |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +The scientific reasoning capabilities can be effectively implemented in Node.js using: |
| 145 | +- **Graph Analysis**: NetworkX equivalent libraries like `graphology` |
| 146 | +- **Scientific APIs**: Direct integration with PubMed, CrossRef, etc. |
| 147 | +- **LLM Integration**: OpenAI/Anthropic/local model APIs |
| 148 | +- **Neo4j**: Excellent Node.js driver support |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +This approach maintains all your innovative scientific reasoning features while meeting Claude's technical requirements perfectly. |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +## π― **Next Steps** |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +1. **Decide on implementation approach** |
| 155 | +2. **Start with quick compliance fixes** (license, manifest, prompts) |
| 156 | +3. **Plan Node.js conversion** if going with Option A |
| 157 | +4. **Update submission timeline** accordingly |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +Would you like me to help implement any of these changes? |
0 commit comments