Skip to content

Add pico2 arm flashless target board #604

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 25, 2025
Merged

Add pico2 arm flashless target board #604

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 25, 2025

Conversation

Grazfather
Copy link
Collaborator

@Grazfather Grazfather commented Jun 22, 2025

Inspired by #602.

Authored by Tudor Andrei Dicu AKA @tact1m4n3

@Grazfather Grazfather requested a review from ikskuh June 22, 2025 16:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@tact1m4n3 tact1m4n3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been working on getting hil-testing to work on rp2350 and I wanted to use a ram image. I struggled a bit until I got anything running in ram. If you want, I can add the changes I made here. I haven't been able to use the ram_entry_point yet since rp2350 expects the image to start with the vector table (if you don't modify anything in bootmeta).

@Grazfather
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Grazfather commented Jun 22, 2025 via email

@tact1m4n3
Copy link
Collaborator

tact1m4n3 commented Jun 24, 2025

I've tested rp2040 and rp2350 (arm + riscv) and they seem to work properly.

@tact1m4n3
Copy link
Collaborator

tact1m4n3 commented Jun 24, 2025

Should be ready! Nah. Just one more thing on my list. Done!

@mattnite
Copy link
Contributor

We gtg?

@tact1m4n3
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep

@mattnite mattnite merged commit 72f71c1 into main Jun 25, 2025
47 checks passed
@mattnite mattnite deleted the pico2_flashless branch June 25, 2025 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants