-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Add ONNX benchmark #381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Add ONNX benchmark #381
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b166f8f
Add image sizes for testing
tkoskela 20cc25b
update with img sizes
tkoskela 2092017
Add missing benchmark definition
tkoskela e697291
Always generate visibilities to avoid filesystem problems
tkoskela 5158877
Fix finding google benchmark
tkoskela bf03a19
fix cmake
tkoskela 669db26
Merge branch 'development' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela 7a3b5cb
linting
tkoskela 2047393
Merge branch 'development' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela 24092be
Fix nondiff_func_type
tkoskela b5ecf3e
Merge branch 'development' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela fdd2a1f
Add argument to control caching visibilities in a file
tkoskela 5a766f6
Fix choice of algorithm
tkoskela 53682f0
Merge branch 'development' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela aa0562b
Fix cmake version to <4.0
tkoskela 1518552
Fix cmake version to <4.0 to work around issue on github actions
tkoskela 312375f
indentation
tkoskela 96f9044
Merge branch 'tk/fix-cmake-version' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela f1361f9
One more
tkoskela 2ed644b
Merge branch 'tk/fix-cmake-version' into tk/onnx-benchmark
tkoskela File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the measurement operator normalisation calculated anywhere? It doesn't appear to be in AlgoFixtureMPI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No? I'd assume it just uses the default 1.0