Skip to content

Conversation

Giom-V
Copy link
Collaborator

@Giom-V Giom-V commented Aug 28, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:quickstarts Issues/PR referencing quickstarts folder labels Aug 28, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Giom-V, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the image handling utilities within the Image_out.ipynb quickstart by upgrading the google-genai library and adopting its new response.parts accessor. This change simplifies the code for displaying and saving image outputs from generative models, improving readability and maintainability. Additionally, it updates a billing-related warning message for better clarity.

Highlights

  • Dependency Update: The google-genai library minimum version has been upgraded from 1.5.0 to 1.32.0 to enable the use of the new response.parts accessor.
  • Code Simplification: The display_response and save_image utility functions in the notebook have been refactored to leverage the response.parts accessor and part.as_image() method, streamlining the process of extracting and handling image data from model responses.
  • User Guidance Improvement: The warning message related to image generation billing has been updated to provide clearer instructions, including a direct link to enable billing, and the background color of the warning box has been changed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves the utility functions in the Image_out.ipynb notebook by adopting the new response.parts accessor, which simplifies the code. The changes also include updating the required SDK version, fixing a broken link, and clarifying the pricing information. My review points out an inconsistency in one of the updated functions where the old accessor is still being used, which I've flagged for correction.

@Giom-V Giom-V merged commit ec7c910 into google-gemini:main Aug 28, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@Giom-V Giom-V deleted the nano-parts branch August 28, 2025 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:quickstarts Issues/PR referencing quickstarts folder status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant