Skip to content

Linter Appeasement #241

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2025
Merged

Linter Appeasement #241

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2025

Conversation

pglombardo
Copy link
Collaborator

@pglombardo pglombardo commented Mar 28, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

Checklist

  • I've written tests (if applicable) for all new methods and classes that I created. (rake test)
  • I've added documentation as necessary so users can easily use and understand this feature/fix.

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Mar 28, 2025
@pglombardo pglombardo added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 9, 2025
@pglombardo pglombardo merged commit ed6c95a into main Jun 9, 2025
10 checks passed
@pglombardo pglombardo deleted the linter-appeasement branch June 9, 2025 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant