Skip to content

No/#405 add olm model #505

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions docs/readthedocs/models/input/OLM.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
.. _olm_model:

overhead line monitoring
----
Representation of an olm type.

Attributes, Units and Remarks
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Type Model
""""""""""

+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| Attribute | Unit | Remarks |
+==============+=========+=============================================+
| uuid | -- | |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| id | -- | Human readable identifier |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| T_s | °C | max. line temperature |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Throughout the PowerSystemDataModel our variable naming shifted a bit towards expressiveness. It would be good, if you could consider some changes in the naming. E.g. temperatureMax. Additionally, we have used camel case in the other documentation pages. So, it would be good, if we could stick with the same concept in all places.

Moreover, we have defined some StandardUnits. Maybe you could consider to switch the units to those.

+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| alpha_line | 1/K | Coefficient of thermal expansion |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| layer | -- | Number of layers per line |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| sq | mm^2 | cross section |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| D_0 | m | Leiterdurchmesser Bewehrung |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As we want to target a wide audience, please use English for the documentation.

+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| R_dc20 | Ohm/m | Specific DC resistance at 20°C |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| Buendelanzahl| -- | |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here.

+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| epsilon | -- | Emissivity According to IEEE Standard 2012 |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+
| alpha_solar | -- | solar absorptivity |
+--------------+---------+---------------------------------------------+




Caveats
^^^^^^^
Nothing - at least not known.
If you found something, please contact us!
5 changes: 0 additions & 5 deletions docs/readthedocs/models/input/grid/line.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -59,11 +59,6 @@ Entity Model
| geoPosition | -- | | Line string of geographical locations describing the |
| | | | position of the line |
+-------------------+------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| olmCharacteristic | -- | | Characteristic of possible overhead line monitoring |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Within the line model, we need some reference to the OLM model. That is, that I'd like to keep this field and possibly rename it to olmModel or so. Moreover, it would also be desired, that we can have simple models as well. That said, would you mind proposing a second olm model (in the way with the above file) to keep the functionality of this simple model?

| | | | Can be given in the form of `olm:{<List of Pairs>}`. |
| | | | The pairs are wind velocity in x and permissible |
| | | | loading in y. |
+-------------------+------+--------------------------------------------------------+

Caveats
^^^^^^^
Expand Down