Skip to content

feat[inspect]: inspects record with symbol properties #99

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

Milly
Copy link
Collaborator

@Milly Milly commented Aug 8, 2024

Note that there is no way to get the string keys and symbol keys in order, so we first enumerate the string keys, then the symbol keys.

@Milly Milly added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.98%. Comparing base (f1c49f5) to head (02a38bc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on symbol-properties-wip.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           symbol-properties-wip      #99   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                  97.98%   97.98%           
======================================================
  Files                         50       50           
  Lines                        794      794           
  Branches                      85       85           
======================================================
  Hits                         778      778           
  Misses                        16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Milly Milly requested a review from lambdalisue August 8, 2024 15:01
@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 0a12716 into symbol-properties-wip Aug 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the symbol-properties/inspect branch August 8, 2024 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants