-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
perf(levm): improve ecpairing (bn128) #4130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
+56
−64
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lines of code reportTotal lines added: Detailed view
|
Benchmark Results ComparisonNo significant difference was registered for any benchmark run. Detailed ResultsBenchmark Results: BubbleSort
Benchmark Results: ERC20Approval
Benchmark Results: ERC20Mint
Benchmark Results: ERC20Transfer
Benchmark Results: Factorial
Benchmark Results: FactorialRecursive
Benchmark Results: Fibonacci
Benchmark Results: FibonacciRecursive
Benchmark Results: ManyHashes
Benchmark Results: MstoreBench
Benchmark Results: Push
Benchmark Results: SstoreBench_no_opt
|
Benchmark Block Execution Results Comparison Against Main
|
Oppen
reviewed
Aug 22, 2025
Comment on lines
+777
to
+779
let batch: Vec<_> = valid_pairs.iter().map(|(p1, p2)| (p1, p2)).collect(); | ||
let pairing_result = BN254AtePairing::compute_batch(&batch) | ||
.map_err(|_| PrecompileError::BN254AtePairingError)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sent an issue to Lambdaworks #1019. This allocation here seems avoidable.
Oppen
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2025
diegokingston
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2025
pedrobergamini
pushed a commit
to pedrobergamini/ethrex
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2025
**Motivation** a 73% improvement over ethrex main The main change is properly batching BN254AtePairing::compute_batch calls <img width="1337" height="1108" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/626ff6ac-978a-4b69-b674-8e5692736912" />
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
a 73% improvement over ethrex main
The main change is properly batching BN254AtePairing::compute_batch calls