-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
EigenDA M1 #409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EigenDA M1 #409
Conversation
Hey there! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Details:
|
## What ❔ Migrates `add_tokens` from COPY to INSERT to avoid globbing user data into the query. Additionally replaces `\x00` (aka NULL) character with whitespace as Postgres can't handle them in `TEXT` fields. ## Why ❔ Robustness ## Is this a breaking change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No ## Operational changes None ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev lint`.
## What ❔ Changed circuit resolver for NodeLayer, Scheduler & RecursionTip. "heavy" jobs for WVG are now basic 2,4,8,9,10,11,12. <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ NodeLayer jobs were using 9GB or RAM during WVG. Additional logic was needed to separate this circuit from other 'light' ones. Some basic circuits have whether greater RAM usage or execution time so they are treated as 'heavy' now. <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- The `Why` has to be clear to non-Matter Labs entities running their own ZK Chain --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Is this a breaking change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No ## Operational changes <!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? --> <!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own ZK Chain may need to know --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev lint`. --------- Co-authored-by: EmilLuta <EmilLuta@users.noreply.github.com>
## What ❔ Support an ability to sign gateway transaction in eth sender ## Why ❔ In the next step we are going to use max_gas_per_pubdata for gateway transaction. ## Is this a breaking change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No ## Operational changes <!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? --> <!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own ZK Chain may need to know --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev lint`. --------- Signed-off-by: Danil <deniallugo@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It appears like we have desync'ed from the contracts submodule "main" branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It appears like we need to change our base contracts branch, there are lots of files here that we haven't touched.
What ❔
This PR adds
Related to: lambdaclass/era-contracts#45
Why ❔
Is this a breaking change?
Operational changes
Checklist
zkstack dev fmt
andzkstack dev lint
.