Skip to content

Conversation

yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member

Depends on btcsuite/btcwallet#1002, in this PR we now fix the issue found in,

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu force-pushed the debug-listunspent branch 2 times, most recently from 6231c36 to 1062c10 Compare April 9, 2025 12:38
Copy link
Member

@Roasbeef Roasbeef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Straight forward changes in this PR, will check out the btcwallet diff.

@saubyk saubyk added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Apr 9, 2025
@saubyk saubyk requested a review from bitromortac April 10, 2025 14:18
@yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member Author

Need #9684 to include the walletdb update

Copy link
Collaborator

@bitromortac bitromortac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code-wise LGTM. I just wanted to check that the referenced issue is fixed with this since the itests are not meant to demonstrate the bug (as discussed with @yyforyongyu).

@yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member Author

Built on top of #9684 since that PR fixes the tests.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bitromortac bitromortac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code-wise LGTM. I just wanted to check that the referenced issue is fixed with this since the itests are not meant to demonstrate the bug (as discussed with @yyforyongyu).

It was not clear to me that this actually covers the bug, but not in terms of ghost utxos appearing but in terms of the locked balance not clearing up (with the changes the locked coins get removed because the wallet is able to recognize the spends).

LGTM, very nice investigation @yyforyongyu 🚀

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Needs a rebase.

Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great investigation and fixes, thanks a lot! LGTM 🎉

@guggero guggero merged commit 24fdae7 into lightningnetwork:master Apr 17, 2025
59 of 66 checks passed
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu deleted the debug-listunspent branch April 17, 2025 20:31
@kallerosenbaum
Copy link

Thanks a lot @yyforyongyu and all reviewers @guggero @bitromortac @Roasbeef . Great work!

Some testing feedback and Qs from me at #8786 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants