Releases: neo4j/docs-status-codes
Releases · neo4j/docs-status-codes
2025.07.0
2025.06.2
remove a leftover category (#355) (#356)
2025.06.0
Clarify that 42NA8 might show sub-commands (#348) (#350) This came out of a discussion here https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/31828#discussion_r2169088716 --------- Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
2025.05.0
Add a note that error messages are deprecated (#313) (#326) A similar one https://github.com/neo4j/docs-operations/pull/2330
2025.04.0
Typo causing broken link #280 (#293) Cherry-picked from https://github.com/neo4j/docs-status-codes/pull/280 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
2025.03.0
Add examples to the glossary descriptions (#275) (#285) Cherry-picked from #275 Co-authored-by: Lasse Heemann <7661319+l-heemann@users.noreply.github.com>
2025.02.0
Remove labels `Introduced in 5.x` (#266) (#267)
5.26.2
Update exact version to 5.26.1 (#250)
5.25.0
Add Neo.ClientNotification.Statement.RuntimeExperimental to the chang…
5.24.1
Notification param format (#192) I think we are not using backticks in a consistent way in the code. So, maybe we should reconsider their usage and leave them just for the docs.