Skip to content

nixos-anywhere: set up substituters from target machine in installer #554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

nixos-anywhere: set up substituters from target machine in installer #554

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

Enzime
Copy link
Member

@Enzime Enzime commented Jun 13, 2025

No description provided.

@Enzime Enzime mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2025
Open
2 tasks
@Enzime
Copy link
Member Author

Enzime commented Jun 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR adds a runtime dependency on jq, I wonder if there's a good way around it or should we just add it as a dependency in the derivation

This PR no longer depends on jq

@Enzime Enzime mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Closed
2 tasks
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Jun 16, 2025

Looks like invalid substituters never make nix copy fail: https://gist.github.com/Mic92/0d7eb111fb65a66b827a87cf7fecaf31

@Mic92 Mic92 force-pushed the push-rtpwvpmwsylv branch from 8bd09f8 to 6f9de5d Compare June 16, 2025 12:48
@Mic92 Mic92 force-pushed the push-rtpwvpmwsylv branch from 6f9de5d to 11d5187 Compare June 16, 2025 12:52
@Enzime Enzime added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit ff87db6 Jun 16, 2025
4 checks passed
@Enzime Enzime deleted the push-rtpwvpmwsylv branch June 16, 2025 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Mic92 Mic92 Mic92 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Enzime @Mic92