Skip to content

Upgrade dependencis #433

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Upgrade dependencis #433

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

bqfan
Copy link

@bqfan bqfan commented Feb 9, 2025

What does this do?

  • Upgrade ESLint version from 8.57.0 to 9.20.0.
  • Refactor ESLint configration from .eslintrc to flat configuration eslint.confgi.mjs.
  • Replace several inline styles with tailwind className.
  • Upgrade dependencies.

Why did you do this?

migrating from .eslintrc to eslint.config.mjs is recommended if you want to take advantage of ESLint's new flat config system.

Who/what does this impact?

  • Better Performance – The new system is faster.
  • More Flexible Configuration – Supports dynamic imports, JavaScript logic, and modern ESM syntax.
  • Future-Proof – ESLint is moving towards eslint.config.mjs as the default.

How did you test this?

  • `pnpm check-all`` passed.
  • Chack all screens for ios and android manually.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for obytes-starter failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0719e36
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/obytes-starter/deploys/67a8dee9343ba20008c993a0

@yjose
Copy link
Member

yjose commented Feb 9, 2025

Can you please add PR description

@bqfan
Copy link
Author

bqfan commented Feb 10, 2025 via email

@yjose
Copy link
Member

yjose commented Feb 10, 2025

@bqfan Normally we are extending our eslint rules from expo, why we are deleting it here ?

@bqfan bqfan closed this Feb 10, 2025
@bqfan bqfan deleted the upgrade-dependencis branch February 10, 2025 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants