Skip to content

Conversation

ldir-EDB0
Copy link
Contributor

Without this, all the clients get the same timeouts and try to renew addresses at the same time. Reduce the T1 & T2 by a pseudo random 0 to 127 seconds, thus the renew attempts are likely to be spread out a bit in time.

What do we think? Sensible? Stupid?

Without this, all the clients get the same timeouts and try to renew
addresses at the same time.  Reduce the T1 & T2 by a pseudo random 0 to
127 seconds, thus the renew attempts are likely to be spread out a bit
in time.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

Sensible - helps guard against update avalanches.

@schuettecarsten
Copy link

Nice idea, patch needs to be updated to work with latest odhcpd codebase

@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

ping @ldir-EDB0 to update this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants