Skip to content

make UnitGenerator public in cargo-as-a-library #15873

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2025

Conversation

secona
Copy link
Contributor

@secona secona commented Aug 21, 2025

What does this PR try to resolve?

This PR makes UnitGenerator public for experimenting with unit graph generation in cargo plumbing commands.

See crate-ci/cargo-plumbing#39

How to test and review this PR?

Verify that UnitGenerator is available when using cargo-as-a-library

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 21, 2025

r? @epage

rustbot has assigned @epage.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-cargo-targets Area: selection and definition of targets (lib, bins, examples, tests, benches) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 21, 2025
@secona secona force-pushed the public-unit-generator branch from fffcd01 to e633ba3 Compare August 21, 2025 12:09
@weihanglo weihanglo added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit c0396fe Aug 21, 2025
23 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 21, 2025
@secona secona deleted the public-unit-generator branch August 21, 2025 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-cargo-targets Area: selection and definition of targets (lib, bins, examples, tests, benches)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants