-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
[Feature] Enable activation selection for fp4 cutlass moe #7718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @yilian49, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the flexibility of the FP4 Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) layer by enabling the selection of different activation functions. Previously, the cutlass_moe_fp4
implementation was restricted to the SiLU activation. This change allows users to choose between SiLU, GeLU, and GeLU-Tanh, providing more architectural options for models utilizing FP4 MoE.
Highlights
- Configurable Activation Functions: The
cutlass_moe_fp4
function now supports selecting between "silu", "gelu", and "gelu_tanh" activation functions, removing the previous hardcoded "silu" limitation. - API Changes: The
cutlass_moe_fp4
function incutlass_moe.py
now accepts anactivation
string argument, and this argument is propagated frommodelopt_quant.py
. - Test Coverage: Unit tests for
cutlass_fp4_moe_no_graph
have been updated to include parametrization for "silu", "gelu", and "gelu_tanh" activations, ensuring proper functionality across supported options.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully extends the cutlass_moe_fp4
function to support multiple activation functions (gelu
, gelu_tanh
, and silu
) instead of hardcoding silu
. The changes are well-implemented, including necessary imports, parameter additions, updated docstrings, and conditional logic to select the appropriate activation kernel. The flashinfer
path correctly maintains its silu
-only restriction, and the unit tests have been updated to cover the new activation options, ensuring correctness and comprehensive testing.
raise ValueError( | ||
f"Unsupported activation function: {activation}. " | ||
"Supported values are 'silu', 'gelu', 'gelu_tanh'." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error message is a bit redundant. Consider making it more concise.
raise ValueError( | |
f"Unsupported activation function: {activation}. " | |
"Supported values are 'silu', 'gelu', 'gelu_tanh'." | |
raise ValueError( | |
f"Unsupported activation function: '{activation}'. " | |
"Expected one of 'silu', 'gelu', 'gelu_tanh'." | |
) |
Motivation
The current
cutlass_moe_fp4
incutlass_moe.py
hardcodessilu
as the activation and raises an error for any other value. Since the file already includes implementations forgelu_tanh
andgelu
, a simple change can enable support for selecting among these activations.Modifications
Added an
activation
string argument tocutlass_moe_fp4
, with a check to ensure it is one ofgelu_tanh
,silu
, orgelu
. The corresponding kernel is invoked based on the selection.Extension
The flashinfer moe directly calls the flashinfer library, so modification to include activation selection is left for future work.
Checklist