-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Fix: w8a8_block_fp8_matmul_triton issues in specific scenarios. #9445
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @solrex, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses critical issues within the w8a8_block_fp8_matmul_triton
kernel, which is currently the sole block-wise FP8 kernel available for sm89. The changes resolve persistent torch.compile
warnings related to argument handling and fix a unit test failure caused by an uninitialized tensor model parallel group, ensuring the kernel's stability and testability.
Highlights
- Resolved
torch.compile
warnings: The method for finding the optimal configuration infp8_kernel.py
was refactored to preventtorch.compile
from issuingincorrect arg count
warnings when usingmin
with akey
argument. This involved changing the lookup logic to explicitly create tuples for comparison. - Fixed unit test failure: The
log_info_on_rank0
utility function inutils.py
was updated to correctly handle scenarios where the tensor model parallel group is not initialized. This modification prevents anAssertionError
that previously caused a unit test to fail, ensuring the test suite runs successfully.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request effectively addresses two separate issues: a torch.compile
warning and a unit test failure due to an uninitialized parallel group. The fixes are correct and well-targeted. I have one suggestion to improve the memory efficiency of the torch.compile
fix by using a generator expression instead of a list comprehension.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Motivation
Currently,
w8a8_block_fp8_matmul_triton
is the only block-wise FP8 kernel available for sm89 (DeepGEMM is not used). This PR addresses 2 persistent issues with this kernel:torch.compile
warnings, , as shown in the logs:test/srt/quant/test_fp8_kernel.py
unit test fails, as demonstrated by the following output when running with SGL_ENABLE_JIT_DEEPGEMM=0:Modifications
_call_min_max of BuiltinVariable(min)
torch.compile warnings.log_info_on_rank0
to ensurew8a8_block_fp8_matmul_triton
unit tests run successfully.You can verify the fix for the torch.compile issue with the following code snippet:
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist