Adds http_request_fire_and_forget
#232
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ZeWaka
requested changes
Jul 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds
rustg_http_request_fire_and_forget, which is similar torustg_http_request_async, but it does not return a job ID. It does not use a job at all in fact - it is for when you want to send an HTTP request, and don't give a crap about the response, mostly for POST requests and such.I couldn't think of a better name, so I'm taking a page from tg's
SSdbcore.FireAndForget, which does the same thing but for SQL.I am very much open to better names (I am a bit tired and woozy :3)