Skip to content

Use Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov for SDIRK time integrators #2505

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 35 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanielDoehring
Copy link
Member

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring requested a review from jlchan July 29, 2025 12:19
Copy link
Contributor

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md with its PR number.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.71%. Comparing base (9b51a54) to head (fcdfd39).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2505      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.88%   96.71%   +1.83%     
==========================================
  Files         512      514       +2     
  Lines       42443    42479      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        40268    41080     +812     
+ Misses       2175     1399     -776     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.71% <100.00%> (+1.83%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring added the example Adding examples (elixirs) label Jul 29, 2025
Co-authored-by: Joshua Lampert <51029046+JoshuaLampert@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Lampert <51029046+JoshuaLampert@users.noreply.github.com>
@JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member

Finally, downgrade tests run 🥳 . So now they only need to pass.

@DanielDoehring
Copy link
Member Author

@jlchan I selected you as reviewer since I changed a typo in one of the existing elixirs :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
example Adding examples (elixirs)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants