Skip to content

updated checkpoint_xdmf method save discontinuous fields properly #328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gthyagi
Copy link
Contributor

@gthyagi gthyagi commented Jun 27, 2025

Created new branch to avoid conflicts
This is same as #327
@julesghub I renamed the def and pulled out of the for loop as you suggested

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the checkpoint_xdmf method to correctly handle and save discontinuous (cell-based) fields alongside continuous (vertex-based) fields by:

  • Introducing a helper to read the size of cell-based fields from HDF5
  • Adjusting the mesh filename pattern to include a leading dot before mesh
  • Dynamically choosing the XDMF Center, Dimensions, and HDF5 path based on field continuity

Comment on lines 2897 to 2904
def get_cell_field_size(h5_filename):
with h5py.File(h5_filename, 'r') as f:
size = f[f'cell_fields/{var.clean_name}_{var.clean_name}'].shape[0]
return size

attributes = ""
for var in meshVars:
var_filename = filename + f"mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
var_filename = filename + f".mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The helper function closes over var.clean_name from the outer scope, which may not refer to the intended variable when called. Consider passing the field name as an explicit parameter or defining this helper within the loop to avoid capturing the wrong var.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Comment on lines 2897 to 2904
def get_cell_field_size(h5_filename):
with h5py.File(h5_filename, 'r') as f:
size = f[f'cell_fields/{var.clean_name}_{var.clean_name}'].shape[0]
return size

attributes = ""
for var in meshVars:
var_filename = filename + f"mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
var_filename = filename + f".mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Defining get_cell_field_size inside checkpoint_xdmf causes it to be redefined on every call. For clarity and efficiency, move this helper to the module level.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.


attributes = ""
for var in meshVars:
var_filename = filename + f"mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
var_filename = filename + f".mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Building filepaths via string concatenation can lead to errors (e.g. extra dots). Consider using os.path.join or at least a single f-string like f"{filename}.mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5" to improve readability and correctness.

Suggested change
var_filename = filename + f".mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"
var_filename = f"{filename}.mesh.{var.clean_name}.{index:05}.h5"

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.


def get_cell_field_size(h5_filename):
with h5py.File(h5_filename, 'r') as f:
size = f[f'cell_fields/{var.clean_name}_{var.clean_name}'].shape[0]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

var is no longer in the scope of this function. This is not good.
Consider passing it in as an argument?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants