ci: 修复工作流问题

[unknowIfGuestInDream]

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

• If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request

Reviewing Maintainer

• Label as either enhancement, bug, documentation or dependencies
• Verify design and implementation

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Update GitHub Actions workflow scripts to use correct module import syntax for @actions/core

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • 优化了GitHub Actions工作流中的模块导入方式，不影响功能。

[naming-conventions-bot]

Thank you for following naming conventions! 😻

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This pull request updates the import syntax for the @actions/core module within the check-aliyun-maven.yml GitHub Actions workflow.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated import syntax for @actions/core module.	Modified require('@actions/core') to use destructuring ({ core } = require('@actions/core')).	.github/workflows/check-aliyun-maven.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
javafx-tool	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 3, 2025 2:15am

[quine-bot]

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

• @unknowIfGuestInDream has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 1224 public PRs merged
• Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
• Here's a good example of their work: javafxTool (Javafx scaffolding, built on JDK17 + JavaFX21 + controlsfx 11.x.x + Maven)
• From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Java and HTML.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: #2126

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

本次更改仅涉及 .github/workflows/check-aliyun-maven.yml 文件，将 @actions/core 的导入方式从默认导入改为了解构导入。具体来说，“Parse dependencies”和“Check Aliyun Maven availability”两个脚本块中的 core 导入语句被统一修改，未涉及其他逻辑、错误处理或控制流的变动。

Changes

文件/路径	变更摘要
.github/workflows/check-aliyun-maven.yml	将 @actions/core 的默认导入改为解构导入，涉及两个脚本块

Suggested reviewers

• unknowIfGuestInDream

Poem

🐇
代码如风轻轻改，
导入方式悄然来。
解构语法更清晰，
依赖检测更自在。
小兔欢跳舞一回，
云端脚本更明白！

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b6ce50 and b8b0ffc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/check-aliyun-maven.yml (2 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @unknowIfGuestInDream - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• Please add a description explaining the context or reason for this workflow change.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Qodana Community for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

GitHub

JetBrains Qodana · Discussions

Explore the GitHub Discussions forum for JetBrains Qodana. Discuss code, ask questions & collaborate with the developer community.