-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Feat(accounts): Add remove account to binding #680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #680 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 15.45% 15.41% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 230 230
Lines 4606 4619 +13
Branches 551 554 +3
==========================================
Hits 712 712
- Misses 3866 3879 +13
Partials 28 28 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this about removing models in bulk or around removing accounts, or both?
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ ITopLevelExceptionHandler topLevelExceptionHandler | |||
|
|||
public void RemoveModel(ModelCard model) => _store.RemoveModel(model); | |||
|
|||
public void RemoveModels(List<ModelCard> models) => _store.RemoveModels(models); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See corollary comment in FE PR: specklesystems/speckle-server#4203 (comment)
tl;dr: do we need this vs. removing models in a for loop?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
got my reply in the other pr
It is a first pass. And tested via console, it does what it supposed to do.