Skip to content

Conversation

yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

This PR reduces the CPU allocation from 2 to 1 in the Cloud Run deployment configuration for the website server. This optimization helps reduce operational costs while maintaining adequate performance for the website.

Changes

  • Updated website/server/cloudbuild.yaml to change CPU allocation from 2 to 1

Checklist

  • Run npm run test
  • Run npm run lint

This change optimizes resource usage for the website server by reducing
the CPU allocation in the Cloud Run deployment configuration. The change
should maintain adequate performance while reducing operational costs.
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 26, 2025 13:54
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Cloud Run deployment configuration in website/server/cloudbuild.yaml updates the CPU allocation for the deploy step from 2 vCPU to 1 vCPU. All other parameters remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Cloud Run deploy config
website/server/cloudbuild.yaml
Updated Cloud Run deploy flag to set CPU from 2 to 1 vCPU; no other parameter changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e3d0f8 and d861cfc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/server/cloudbuild.yaml (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/website-cpu

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @yamadashy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to optimize operational costs for the website server by reducing the CPU allocation in its Cloud Run deployment configuration from 2 to 1. This change is intended to maintain adequate performance while achieving cost savings.

Highlights

  • Cost Optimization: Reduced the CPU allocation for the website server's Cloud Run deployment from 2 to 1, aiming to lower operational costs.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit 07bd757 into main Aug 26, 2025
54 of 56 checks passed
@yamadashy yamadashy deleted the feat/website-cpu branch August 26, 2025 13:55
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request reduces the Cloud Run CPU allocation from 2 to 1 in the cloudbuild.yaml file to lower operational costs. While the change is simple and achieves its cost-saving goal, reducing CPU resources by half introduces a significant performance risk. I have added a high-severity comment highlighting the potential for increased latency or request timeouts and recommending that this change be validated through performance testing or followed by close monitoring post-deployment to ensure service stability.

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ steps:
- '--memory'
- '1024Mi'
- '--cpu'
- '2'
- '1'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Halving the CPU allocation from 2 to 1 is a significant change that introduces a risk of performance degradation, potentially leading to increased request latency or timeouts under heavy load. A change of this nature should be supported by performance testing data to ensure service level objectives (SLOs) can still be met. I strongly recommend either conducting load tests to validate this change before merging or implementing enhanced monitoring of CPU utilization, instance count, and request latency (p95/p99) immediately following deployment to quickly detect and mitigate any negative impact on performance.

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR optimizes the Cloud Run deployment configuration for the website server by reducing CPU allocation from 2 to 1 to achieve cost savings while maintaining adequate performance.

  • Reduces CPU allocation from 2 cores to 1 core in the Cloud Run configuration

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.41%. Comparing base (1e3d0f8) to head (d861cfc).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #809   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.41%   87.41%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines        6493     6493           
  Branches     1331     1331           
=======================================
  Hits         5676     5676           
  Misses        817      817           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant