Skip to content

Conversation

mohamedawnallah
Copy link
Contributor

Change Description

Depends on #1042.
Towards #1041.
Towards #1015.

Steps to Test

Steps for reviewers to follow to test the change.

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

@mohamedawnallah mohamedawnallah changed the title multi: Introduce make rpc-check to CI workflow multi: Introduce make rpc and make rpc-check to CI workflow Aug 19, 2025
@mohamedawnallah mohamedawnallah force-pushed the introduce-make-rpc-check-to-workflow branch from f87b74b to f86e637 Compare August 19, 2025 02:41
In this commit, we replace the local protoc dependency with a
Docker-based solution. This will help in give reproducable and
deterministic results across different computing environments.
before adding `make rpc-check` to CI workflow, make sure we ignore
capturing protobuf generated files so they don't conflict with
`make fmt` and endup fail in the CI
@mohamedawnallah mohamedawnallah force-pushed the introduce-make-rpc-check-to-workflow branch from f86e637 to 9662432 Compare August 21, 2025 12:40
@mohamedawnallah
Copy link
Contributor Author

mohamedawnallah commented Aug 21, 2025

Rebased on master branch. It is now ready for review

Copy link
Collaborator

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM🚢

Copy link
Contributor

@GustavoStingelin GustavoStingelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu merged commit 43c1d81 into btcsuite:master Aug 25, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants